1 request
The Conversation

Are you a rapid ager? Biological age is a better health indicator than the number of years you’ve lived, but it’s tricky to measure

https://theconversation.com/are-you-a-rapid-ager-biological-age-is-a-better-health-indicator-than-the-number-of-years-youve-lived-but-its-tricky-to-measure-198849

Aging is a major risk factor for many chronic diseases. Figuring out what influences longevity and how to identify rapid agers could lead to healthier and longer lives for more people.

See all reviews for The Conversation
Total Score
Reviewed by 1 scientist
Evidence
Balance
Clarity

Reviews

JH
Joshua Harvey
Reviewed on 8 Oct 2024
6
Evidence
6
Balance
10
Clarity

This article does a good job of providing a lay summary for a number of interesting aspects of age research. It provides a decent level of balance, in particular caveating the use of epigenetics as a readout of biological age, which is a field of substantial debate (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y). Certain research limitations and potential biases are not covered, for example research on blue zones is currently being critiqued for bias of samples used and potential misreporting of ages in certain highlighted populations (https://theconversation.com/the-data-on-extreme-human-ageing-is-rotten-from-the-inside-out-ig-nobel-winner-saul-justin-newman-239023).

0
Thank you for reporting this comment, this will be passed on to administrators.